<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CLARZZIQUE &#124; Sydney Wedding Photographer &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.clarzzique.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.clarzzique.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fuji Instax = Polaroid 300 ??</title>
		<link>http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/06/16/fuji-instax-polaroid-300/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/06/16/fuji-instax-polaroid-300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clarissa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuji film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid 300]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clarzzique.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, I would blog about this. During my recent Melbourne trip, I came across an instant camera, what looked much like a Fuji Instax, but was branded under Polaroid.Polaroid [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/02/24/japan-visiting-fuji/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: [JAPAN] Visiting Fuji'>[JAPAN] Visiting Fuji</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/07/26/autumns-child/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Autumn&#8217;s Child'>Autumn&#8217;s Child</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike" style="height:25px; height:25px; overflow:hidden;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.clarzzique.com%2F2010%2F06%2F16%2Ffuji-instax-polaroid-300%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=300&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allow Transparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:300px;"></iframe></div><p>As promised, I would blog about this.</p>
<p>During my recent Melbourne trip, I came across an instant camera, what looked much like a <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>Fuji Instax</em></span>, but was branded under Polaroid.<em><span style="color: #ff6600;"><a href="http://www.polaroid.com/product/0/354634/PIC-300/_/300_Instant_Camera" target="_blank">Polaroid 300</a></span></em> which released in May.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="c" src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/clarentina/instax-mini-7s-white.jpg" alt="" width="366" height="366" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Fuji Film Instax Mini 7s</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="c" src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/clarentina/polaroid300.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="333" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Polaroid 300</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>You can see the similarities yourself?</em></span></p>
<p>I approached the Polaroid booth at the Digital Life Expo / PMA, and asked the sales people if they know about the Fuji Film Instax.</p>
<p>Alot of them said, they&#8217;ve &#8216;heard&#8217; of it, but haven&#8217;t actually seen it themselves.</p>
<p>So I pulled out my Fuji Instax and showed them, they tried to trick each other that its the new &#8216;white version&#8217; of the Polaroid 300 (they covered the model #) and you really can&#8217;t tell the difference. Just that, the <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>Polaroid has uglier colours, </em></span>Red (maroon-y), blue and black. I just thought, urgh <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>the colours are so YESTERDAY!</em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="c" src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/clarentina/polaroid-vs-instax-guess.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="480" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>sorry scanner&#8217;s dirty =.=</em> (answers at the end of this post!)</p>
<p>Funny because, they hired<em> <span style="color: #ff6600;">Lady Gaga as the Creative Director</span></em><span style="color: #ff6600;">,</span> as a way to <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>&#8216;reconnect with the avante-garde pop culture&#8217;</em></span>. What&#8217;s so avante garde about the overall look? I&#8217;d expect funky prints &amp; colours.</p>
<p>But yeah, apparently Polaroid has bought the patent from Fuji, so I guess its a way for it to resurface again. I had mixed emotions when I first saw it, I wished I had waited a little later for a &#8216;Polaroid Instax&#8217; instead, but then again <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>Fuji is much more affordable!</em></span> Polaroid is 1.5 or 2x more expensive than Fuji. <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>Ridiculous. </em></span></p>
<p>At the time, we weren&#8217;t sure whether they had exactly the same film, because the colour quality was so much more vibrant with the Polaorid. The <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>film size and all seemed the same</em></span> and apparently, we could use the Polaroid film in my Fuji. I&#8217;m curious, I have yet to try that. We made a comparison between the two camera&#8217;s photo quality.(above)</p>
<p>What I noticed is that, Polaroid film seem to reflect the colours of Polaroid, that is the <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>green tones</em></span>, whereas Instax had more<span style="color: #ff6600;"><em> red tones.</em></span> I also found that <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>Polaroid was more sharper</em></span> (even looking at other sample shots) than Fuji. I thought this had something to do with the camera, but the bf says its all in the chemicals of the film that affects sharpness and colours, right, wrong? I&#8217;m not sure if I prefer Polaroid or the Fuji quality, but I&#8217;d love some extra sharpness in my photos.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to take a risk and purchase a pack of Polaroid 300 film for testing, when I come across it on sale.</p>
<p>Will keep posted :)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="c" src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/clarentina/polaroid-vs-instax.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="480" /></p>
<p>Did you guess right??</p>
<p>Maybe its my scanner, but the actual photo was slightly more green (polaroid), red (instax) and you can tell the Polaroid is sharper.. not even sure if this is a great comparison image since it wasn&#8217;t taken at the same distance&#8230; but <span style="color: #ff6600;"><em>you can tell there is a colour difference atleast&#8230; </em></span></p>
<p>What do you think?</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/02/24/japan-visiting-fuji/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: [JAPAN] Visiting Fuji'>[JAPAN] Visiting Fuji</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/07/26/autumns-child/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Autumn&#8217;s Child'>Autumn&#8217;s Child</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clarzzique.com/2010/06/16/fuji-instax-polaroid-300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

